Skip to content

Conversation

paulb777
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Contributor

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

@google-oss-bot
Copy link

1 Warning
⚠️ Did you forget to add a changelog entry? (Add #no-changelog to the PR description to silence this warning.)

Generated by 🚫 Danger

@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves the API documentation for URLContext and related types. The changes generally make the documentation clearer and more descriptive. I've found a couple of issues in the updated comments: one seems to be a copy-paste error, and another refers to a non-existent type. Please see my detailed comments for suggestions on how to fix them. Otherwise, the documentation improvements look great.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request provides good improvements to the API documentation for URLContext and related types. The changes make the documentation clearer and more consistent. I have one minor suggestion to further improve documentation linking.

paulb777 and others added 2 commits September 19, 2025 10:50
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request focuses on improving the API documentation for URLContext and related components. The changes significantly enhance clarity and consistency across the documentation for GenerateContentResponse, Tool, URLContextMetadata, and URLMetadata. The updated comments are more descriptive, user-friendly, and fix a minor typo. Overall, this is a solid set of documentation improvements with no issues found.

@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

Merging here. Additional comments welcome and will be addressed in a subsequent PR.

@paulb777 paulb777 merged commit 10e4e4c into ah/firebaseai-urlcontext Sep 19, 2025
42 checks passed
@paulb777 paulb777 deleted the pb-update-api-docs branch September 19, 2025 20:50
paulb777 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants